Unemployed

Today, at co-op, while I was waiting for children, I spent a couple of hours completing the child evaluations that need to be done as part of being enrolled in our state's program for disseminating Title V funds. (The shorter version is I had a lot of forms to fill out so we can keep four of our children enrolled in the state program which helps with medical costs.) It's a pain, but definitely worth it... even times four.

I don't fill out forms well. I often dislike the options I am given to choose from when answering a question. Heck, I often dislike the question. People aren't standardized, and some of my children are even more not standardized. I gave up long ago trying to bend my answers to fit the form. My forms, when completed, will have many arrows pointing to a longer response than was asked for. I just don't play well with others.

All of this is in explanation as to why, in a section asking about family members of the enrolled child, there is an arrow pointing to a very long response. I was to list each family member (which grows exceedingly tiresome times four), and to give their employment status. The options were: 'full time', 'part time', 'unemployed'. At first glance, probably no one would give this a second thought. It's pretty standard. But personally, I find it more than a little infuriating.

So what I am to check for myself? I'm not employed full time; I earn no salary. I am not employed part time. This leaves me with unemployed. Am I unemployed? That sounds as though I don't do anything of importance throughout the day. Unemployed says to me that what I spend my time doing, if I'm doing anything, has no value at all. Because I do not earn a paycheck, my work does not matter.

I don't actually believe this, but I can say that this is how it feels when confronted with options such as these. Here's the crazy part, though. Were I to put my children into traditional school, their teachers, who would be earning a paycheck, would matter. (I'm the daughter of a public school teacher, and I know that even teachers earning a paycheck feel, and rightfully so, undervalued. This is not my point at the moment. There are also plenty of instances where teachers are held up as doing good and noble work, which they are. It is not a total wasteland of appreciation. And they would still be able to mark 'full time' in terms of employment.) A couple of my children would need to be in special classrooms, needing much more individualized attention and a whole host of specialists to fulfill what I imagine would be some pretty intense IEP's. That's several more people earning a paycheck to educate my children. All of these people, the second they earn money doing what I do for nothing, suddenly have far more value in general society because they are earning money for what they do.

This is starting to sound a bit like sour grapes, and I don't mean it to be. I don't need a lot of public adulation, and in fact do not want it. I do what I do because I love my children, and (usually) because I enjoy it. I also happen to think it is the best education choice for them. What I want is for the societal pendulum to swing back a little more to the point where we can fathom that people can do real and valuable worthwhile work without a paycheck being attached. What I want is for people to stop being defined by the amount of money they earn. And I really want a fourth option for the trio of 'full time', 'part time', and 'unemployed'. Or, if I have to mark 'unemployed', boy would I like a little more free time to go along with it.

Comments

Anonymous said…
That's like you're saying "but the options are only 'Single, Married, or Divorced, but I've been with my boyfriend for five years! I'm not single!".

I know you know this, but you really need to take it to heart. They're not asking "dear, what do you do all day?", they're asking about your legal status. Do you, personally, on your own income, pay taxes? Are you employed? Are the heads of household both employed or is there just one person earning the money? The person reading the form really doesn't care that you are educating all of your children all day and doing housework and feeding the masses etc. They don't need another option. They're still getting the information they desire.
Jayview said…
I have a very similar response to form filling and survey questions. Workload a counselling psychologist I used to get a lot of research surveys to answer. I’d attempt them, from professional obligation, but could hardly ever complete them, giving up exasperated at the attempt to fit my experience into categories it didn’t fit. Very few forms or surveys are well designed. People who prefer to use intuition ahead of sensing (Jungian type theory and MBTI) probably have particular difficulty with forms because they can see so many alternative possibilities.

I agree too about the need for a new understanding of work and revaluing of all the important work (often more than full time) that is not paid. Writers and artists might be recognised as working but often not educators and caters. There can be an inquiry into what people earn that could be separated from their account of how much they work and at what.
Jayview said…
Sorry - should be ‘working as a counselling psychologist’ (and educator and researcher)

Popular posts from this blog

Making bias tape... otherwise known as the Sew, Mama, Sew! Giveaway

An uncomfortable post

Sew, Mama, Sew! Giveaway